ExxonMobil CEO Says Oil Price Should Be $60 To $70 A Barrel
Rex Tillerson, the boss of ExxonMobil admitted last week that the price of oilbased purely on supply and demand- should be in the $60 to $70 a barrel range. The reason its above $100 a barrel, Tillerson explained, is due to the oil majors using futures contracts to lock in current high prices, and speculation that is engineered by the high-frequency trading of quantitative hedge funds.
That was just one of the stunning revelations made during the Senate hearing on tax subsidies to the oil industry which featured the 6 most powerful CEOs BP, Shell, Chevron, Conoco-Phillips and Exxon-Mobil all sitting like ducks in a row giving t he stiff-arm to pressing unfriendly inquiries from a host of Democratic Senators.
The formal showdown between Big Oil and Big Politics was enormously revealing theater about just how selfish and narrow-minded cash-rich industry can be when called upon to do their patriotic duty in balancing the budget. Ouch!!!
Here are some other juicy disclosures from the hearing:
The average cost of producing 1 barrel of oil was $11; the average price of the oil in the marketplace$72 some 6.5 times the cost of getting tghe oil out of the ground.
The profits for the big 6 oil companies was $36 billion in the years first quarter. A large part of the $36 billion was used to buyback shares or pay dividends to shareholders.
These giant US companies have only 1.4% of global oil reserves; the national companies of OPEC have 68% of the reserves. Therefore, argue the CEOs best not to take away tax adanatages, ie what the Senators call subsidies.
If those nasty Senators take away the tax advantages, exploration for oil in the US will dry up and move abroad where t he tax advantages are splendid. This is called waving t he red flag- and threatening to put the nations oil deficit in even more dollar-bashing trouble.
If Obama doesnt loosen restrictions on drilling in Alaska and offshore US we will become even more horribly dependent on importing foreign oil.
There is NO energy plan for the US and warns Sen. Max Baucus of Montana- we will require the good faith on everyones part which is going to be enormously difficult. This is an understatement when one sees the way the oil executives and the Senators agree on almost nothing. No CEO would admit the tax advantages were subsidies.
The deduction for intangible drilling expenses was given the oil industry in 1960 when a barrel was worth about $15-17. So, why do they need this favor when oil is $100 a barrel? Good bloody question , I thought. The oil execs looked horrified and warned that all exploration in the US would cease and desist.
Similar Posts:
- Reliance Defends Its KG-D6 Deal after Being Blamed For ‘Gold Plating’
- Report Details Shocking Subsidies, Environmental Damage
- Buy Oil Drillers on Weakness as Pan-Arabian Revolution Spreads Across North Africa and the Middle East
- Iraq’s Oil Minister Claims It Can Be Globe’s Largest Oil Producer
- Internal Documents Detail Radiation in Water Supply
